severa
12. Mircea Florian (1888-1960) |
|
"Mircea Florian e cu douăzeci de ani mai tânăr decât C. Rădulescu-Motru. El face parte dintr-o următoare generaţie de maiorescieni. În cadrul continuităţii, îşi poate asuma o poziţie mai independentă şi de certă originalitate. Accentuata sa fidelitate de o viaţă faţă de filosofie, ca profesor şi cercetător mereu predispus şi la ucenicii, nu îl depersonalizează, ci dimpotrivă, îl ajută să-şi des¬copere un loc aparte, dovedit cu timpul a fi locul cel mai trainic din întreaga filiaţie raţionalistă a filosofiei de până acum. El dobândeşte însă nespectaculos soliditatea, în manieră de „ştiinţă severă” deşi nu neapărat în manieră husserliană. În filosofia noastră, el pare mai apropiat de felul în care şi-a conceput activitatea - într-o altă, mult mai prestigioasă, tradiţie filosofică naţională - Nicolai Hartmann.
Născut la Bucureşti, absolvent al Colegiului „Sf. Sava”, cu licenţa la Facultatea de Litere şi Filosofie a Universităţii din Bucureşti (1911) - unde i-a audiat pe Titu Maiorescu, C. Dimitrescu-Iaşi, C. Rădulescu-Motru, P.P. Negulescu şi alţii -, doctor în filosofie al Universităţii din Greifswald, cu o cercetare critică despre noţiunea de timp la Henri Bergson dedicată lui P.P. Negulescu (1914), Mircea Florian parcurge, la Universitatea bucureşteană, toate treptele, obţinând doar târziu (1940) gradul de profesor universitar titular.............." BIBLIOGRAFIE 1. Mircea Florian, Recesivitatea ca structură a lumii, Vol.II, Ed. Eminescu, 1987 2. *** Istoria filosofiei româneşti, Buc., Ed. Academiei, Vol. I, ediţia a II-a, 1985 3. Ion Ianoşi, O istorie a filosofiei româneşti, Cluj, Biblioteca Apostrof, 1996 4. Gh. Al. Cazan, Istoria filosofiei româneşti, E.D.P., 1984 5. Gheorghe Vlăduţescu, Neconvenţional, despre filosofia românească, Buc., Ed. Paideia, 2002 6. Bagdasar Nicolae, Scrieri, Buc., Ed. Eminescu, 1988 . Mircea, florian, radulescu-motru, maiorescieni, stiinta, severa, husserliana, nicolai hartmann, rostul si utilitatea filosofiei, stiinta si rationalism, reconstructie filosofica, metafizica si arta, misticism si credinta, reconstructie filosofica, sensul unei filosofii romanesti, filosofle romaneasca, kantianism, gnoseologica-epistemologica, realism, vulgar, ontologic, rationalismul, j, rehmke, misologismul, irationalismul, nominalismul, structura, lumii, monisme, dualitati, antiteze, opozitii, universala, datului, factorul, recesiv, arta de a suferi, trepetnic sufletesc, existenta tragica, rosca, frica, suferinta, moarte, noblete, panestetism, pancalism, pulchritudinis, religia, metoda, filologica, bibliografica, metoda, psihologica, biografica, culturala, problematica, critica, lucian blaga, constantin noica, ion ianosi, cazan, bagdasar nicolae |
|
Istoria filosofiei româneşti Numar pagini: 5
|
Life Of Rodin |
|
Auguste Rodin was born November 12, 1840 in Paris and attended the Ecole des Arts Decoratifs in Paris at age 14. Rodin had a special gift for modeling human figures and faces; therefore sculpting humans is all he did. Decorators and commercial sculptors exploited Rodin at a very young age. It was some 20 years before he could sculpt for himself, under the commercial sculptor Albert Carrier-Belleuse. (Auguste, 19)
Rodin sculpted ornamental figures for several major buildings in Brussels, such as the Bourse and the Palais des Academies. He then worked on the monument to Jean-Francois Loos, the former mayor of Antwerp. Rodin did not start this monument, but he work on it. Rodin acquired a sufficient amount of money to travel to Italy, which was an important step in his career. In 1877 he returned to Paris with his first major sculpture, The Age of Bronze. This piece of work showed a young man coming out of misery and depression to a state of heightened awareness. Critics and fellow artists thought and also accused Rodin of making this piece from a plaster cast taken directly from a living person. This deeply hurt Rodin. (Auguste, 19) In 1880, Rodin was contracted by the French government to make a door for the projected Musee des Arts Decortifs. Rodin worked endlessly on the sketches for the bronze door, now titled The Gates of Hell. In 1883 Rodin met Camille, this is when he had reached his “decisive stage” in preparations for The Gates of Hell. This aspect of Rodin’s work and ideas has to be borne in mind considering the beginning of his relationship with Camille Claude. (Auguste, 21-22) . Rodin |
|
Engleza Numar pagini: 2
|
Anna Karenina: Characters and the Life Novel |
|
By examining the character list, one immediately notices the value
Tolstoy places on character. With one hundred and forty named characters and several other unnamed characters, Tolstoy places his central focus in Anna Karenina on the characters. He uses their actions and behavior to develop the plot and exemplify the major themes of the novel. In contrast to Flaubert's Madame Bovary, Tolstoy wishes to examine life as it really is. Both novels have relationships and adultery as a central theme. However, Tolstoy gives us a much more lifelike representation in Anna Karenina by creating characters, both major and minor, that contribute to the sense of realism. . Anna karenina, tolstoy |
|
Engleza Numar pagini: 3
|
Hamlet Analyzed in Terms of Aristotle s Poetics |
| Aristotle’s Poetics is considered the guide to a well written tragedy; his methods have been used for centuries. In Aristotle’s opinion, plot is the most important aspect of the tragedy, all other parts such as character, diction, and thought stem from the plot. Aristotle defines a tragedy as “…an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, the several kinds being found in separate parts of the play; in the form of action, not of narrative; through pity and fear effecting the proper purgation of these emotions”(p. 22). Shakespeare’s Hamlet follows this definition for the most part, and even though it is not always in agreement with Aristotle’s guidelines, it is still a great and effective tragedy.. Hamlet, aristotle, shakespeare |
|
Engleza Numar pagini: 2
|
Anorexia And What Causes It |
|
Eating disorders are not new. Anorexia Nervosa was first formally diagnosed in 1874, and the symptoms have been observed as far back as 300 years ago.(Walsh and Devlin 1) Although the condition has been known for centuries, it seems to be center stage now during the last decade or so.
What is behind Anorexia? Is it inherited? Is Anorexia caused by some type of mental illness, or maybe environmental pressures? Does culture play a role in whether or not someone suffers from Anorexia? These questions are not easily answered,as we know if we have had any family members or close friends who have suffered from Anorexia. It's not as easily diagnosed as the measles or chickenpox, where the doctor knows exactly what the cause is. We will discover that there is no one clearcut cause for Anorexia. According to Women's Health Weekly one research study collected blood from 200 families where at least two of the siblings were suffering from Anorexia, several of the test results suggest a possible link between Anorexia and a shared suseptability gene found in many of the siblings (10) . We must keep in mind that although this research is promising it is still as of yet incomplete data, which in essence makes it a theory. This by no means suggests that there is not a biological link, but that more research needs to be done. . Anorexia |
|
Engleza Numar pagini: 2
|